31 research outputs found

    A pulse compression radar system for high-resolution ionospheric sounding

    Get PDF
    A low frequency pulse compression radar system, capable of 0.75 km spatial resolution, has been developed. This system utilizes a linear frequency-modulated signal, and yields an effective peak power enhancement of 14.5 dB, over a conventional radar of equivalent resolution. The required instrumentation, as well as the development of the necessary signal processing software, are described in detail. It is shown that the resolution and peak power enhancement achieved by the system are consistent with those predicted by theory. The effectiveness of the pulse compression radar as a tool for ionospheric observation is demonstrated by comparing its performance to that of a conventional radar operating simultaneously

    Divergence in Dialogue

    Get PDF
    Copyright: 2014 Healey et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC; http://www.esrc.ac.uk/) through the DynDial project (Dynamics of Conversational Dialogue, RES-062-23-0962) and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC; http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/) through the RISER project (Robust Incremental Semantic Resources for Dialogue, EP/J010383/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

    When Your Decisions Are Not (Quite) Your Own: Action Observation Influences Free Choices

    Get PDF
    A growing number of studies have begun to assess how the actions of one individual are represented in an observer. Using a variant of an action observation paradigm, four experiments examined whether one person's behaviour can influence the subjective decisions and judgements of another. In Experiment 1, two observers sat adjacent to each other and took turns to freely select and reach to one of two locations. Results showed that participants were less likely to make a response to the same location as their partner. In three further experiments observers were asked to decide which of two familiar products they preferred or which of two faces were most attractive. Results showed that participants were less likely to choose the product or face occupying the location of their partner's previous reaching response. These findings suggest that action observation can influence a range of free choice preferences and decisions. Possible mechanisms through which this influence occurs are discussed

    Introduction

    No full text
    corecore